Oneirox

Utility type · EEG baseline · metric dataset

Hypnagogic limb-float percept · theta 4.11–9.11 Hz · N1

Hypnagogic limb-float percept, scattered across broken stage fragments — atonia state "N/A", band theta (4.11–9.11 Hz), lead transmitter GABA. Density 97 for row #14006106.

Cortical activity model

4.11–9.11 Hz · theta · seed 14006106

4.11–9.11 Hz · theta seed 14006106 · eeg_baseline
Band benchmarks for this row
MetricValue
EEG min (Hz)4.11
EEG max (Hz)9.11
Bandtheta
PhaseN1 / fragmentation
Atonia stateN/A
Density score97

Somatic → text readout

Dataset readout: Hypnagogic limb-float percept in N1 (fragmentation). Cortical window 4.11–9.11 Hz (theta). Atonia=N/A. Markers drive the text below — not dream-symbol meanings.

Mechanism stack
  1. N1 sleep frames hypnagogic limb-float percept, scattered across broken stage fragments, against a theta trace of 4.11–9.11 Hz.
  2. The lead transmitter is GABA (inhibitory tone rises across cortical and spinal targets), alongside norepinephrine, orexin — this row's density score is 97.
  3. Dataset row #14006106: atonia 30/100, arousal 38/100, coherence 60/100 — the motor brake is thin, so movement can leak through, against a moderately organized backdrop.
  4. On this fragmentation row the markers stack as "light numbness" → "floating limbs" → "body-boundary blur" — each one restarting the signal rather than continuing it.
  5. The Lab treats "body-boundary blur" here as fragmentation somatic evidence layered onto imagery for N1 sleep — scored as hardware, not metaphor.

Recall naming "body-boundary blur" in N1 sleep, during fragmentation bursts, gets read by the Lab as body evidence, not as a dream symbol.

Transmitter focus

GABA

inhibitory cortical/spinal brake

norepinephrine

wake-pressure aminergic return

orexin

wake-promotion destabilizer

Felt on waking

On waking, the marker named most often is "body-boundary blur" with "floating limbs" close behind. Because this row sits at fragmentation in N1 sleep, it arrives in disconnected pieces rather than one continuous thread.

Related physiology

This row connects to Cortex & EEG — the wake-like cortical activity that drives memory work in this stage.

How Lab Search uses this row

The Lab does not look up "body-boundary blur" in a symbol table — tied here to GABA activity; it uses it to weight the BODY line of your N1 reading toward mechanism.

Which markers match waking recall?

Search with body context →

Was this utility useful?

How to read Hypnagogic limb-float percept · theta 4.11–9.11 Hz · N1

This row is Hypnagogic limb-float percept in N1 (fragmentation). Cortical window 4.11–9.11 Hz (theta). Atonia state: N/A. Density 97. Chart seed 14006106 is deterministic for this URL — the trace is a model of the row, not a clinical EEG.

Gauges on this page: atonia 30, arousal 38, coherence 60. Markers: body-boundary blur, floating limbs, light numbness. Transmitters tagged: GABA, norepinephrine, orexin. Those fields are why two “similar” titles are not duplicates. If a marker did not happen to you, say so — do not wear the whole row.

What the body is doing — not what the image “means”

On waking, the marker named most often is "body-boundary blur" with "floating limbs" close behind. Because this row sits at fragmentation in N1 sleep, it arrives in disconnected pieces rather than one continuous thread. Recall naming "body-boundary blur" in N1 sleep, during fragmentation bursts, gets read by the Lab as body evidence, not as a dream symbol.

  1. N1 sleep frames hypnagogic limb-float percept, scattered across broken stage fragments, against a theta trace of 4.11–9.11 Hz.
  2. The lead transmitter is GABA (inhibitory tone rises across cortical and spinal targets), alongside norepinephrine, orexin — this row's density score is 97.
  3. Dataset row #14006106: atonia 30/100, arousal 38/100, coherence 60/100 — the motor brake is thin, so movement can leak through, against a moderately organized backdrop.
  4. On this fragmentation row the markers stack as "light numbness" → "floating limbs" → "body-boundary blur" — each one restarting the signal rather than continuing it.
  5. The Lab treats "body-boundary blur" here as fragmentation somatic evidence layered onto imagery for N1 sleep — scored as hardware, not metaphor.

How Lab Search should use this row

The Lab does not look up "body-boundary blur" in a symbol table — tied here to GABA activity; it uses it to weight the BODY line of your N1 reading toward mechanism. Then open Decode if you also have a plot. The plot is optional; the body line is not.

This utility will not treat Hypnagogic limb-float percept as a spirit, a pregnancy test, or a death omen. It will treat it as a stage-bound somatic metric. If symptoms are nightly, worsening, or include dream enactment, that is clinical, not catalog.

Find the mechanism behind tonight’s signal

Not a symbol dictionary. Describe what you remember — images, body sensations, waking state — in Lab Search for the closest dream or somatic mechanism page.

Open Lab Search →

Not a medical diagnosis. Dataset row for exploration only.